Why Cardiac Rhythm Device Patient Portals Will Start the Digital Health Revolution

Heretofore this series has focused on issues specific to patients with implantable cardiac rhythm devices who deserve to access their device’s own data directly via patient portals or PHRs.  What I would like to suggest is that if this PHR becomes a reality soon, that it will lead to widespread adoption of patient portals in general. Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac rhythm devices was the first widespread use of remote patient monitoring.  It was adopted slowly for many reasons.  However, early demonstration of its merits (increasing provider efficiency, cost reduction for providers. patients, and caregivers), as well as other studies showing clinical benefits and improved post-market surveillance of devices and leads resulted in mass acceptance.

Publicity about these portals bringing vital information which will improve healthcare of cardiac device patients will foster awareness of patient portals in general. Cardiology is a high-profile section of medicine because of the prevalence of heart disease (number one killer of men and women in the USA), the economic resources it utilizes (estimated 40% of Medicare dollars), and an area of significant health care technology development.

Social media discussions abound now about patients demanding direct access to data provided by their implantable cardiac devices. These portals will therefore be meeting a ready-made need, and will therefore, I believe, be adopted fairly rapidly.

Technological considerations in developing these portals can be applied to other patient monitoring technologies (perhaps incorporated?).  This might be analogous to offshoot technologies developed during the quest to land men on the moon (see http://davidleescher.com/2011/12/19/will-mhealth-be-the-next-flight-to-the-moon/).

The importance of the creation of these specific portals is that it has been driven by patient demand as well as regulatory mandate.  PHR adoption has been slow because of lack of technology in many EHRs, lack of patient demand in general (likely due to lack of education about their rights to EHRs), and a possible medical cultural conflict of interest where providers are not prepared to deal with the reaction of patients who receive their EHR (time-consuming follow-up questions, explanations, challenging factual correctness, etc).  The relatively small size of the cardiac electrophysiology community of providers and patients lends itself to being a showcase of navigating through the education and adoption process of all stakeholders, and provides a fertile ground for solutions to technical challenges involved as well.  Stay tuned.


About davidleescher

David Lee Scher, MD is Founder and Director at DLS HEALTHCARE CONSULTING, LLC, which specializes in advising digital health technology companies, their partners, investors, and clients. As a cardiac electrophysiologist and pioneer adopter of remote patient monitoring, he understood early on the challenges that the culture and landscape of healthcare present to the development and adoption of digital technologies. He is a well-respected thought leader in mobile and other digital health technologies. Scher lectures worldwide on relevant industry topics including the role of tech in Pharma, patient advocacy, standards for development and adoption, and impact on patients and healthcare systems from clinical, risk management, operational and marketing standpoints. He is a Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Penn State College of Medicine.
This entry was posted in digital health, healthcare reform, Implantable Defibrillators, medical devices, mobile health, smartphone apps, technology, telehealth, wireless health and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Why Cardiac Rhythm Device Patient Portals Will Start the Digital Health Revolution

  1. Every night I check the activity of my social media accounts. When I am 70, would it be too much to ask if I wanted to do the same with my implantable cardiac device? I am 35 now so I am hoping that in 35 years, a wireless signal in my implantable device could pump info to a server that would run analytics for me to see how things have been doing for 24 hrs, 3 days, 7 days, etc.

  2. As the number of monitored sensors increase, I envision some sort of PHR “dashboard” that selects and presents the data in the most understandable form. Accelerometers will measure activity and sleep patterns. Home environmental sensors will monitor when doors (refrigerator, shower, front door) open. Wearables will track pulse, temp and other vitals. Standards will be needed to allow for interoperability. Eventually (10-15 years), we may see real time recording of everything you see and hear with the ability to recall and project it on heads-up displays, like Google’s new ski visors. But it’s more about understanding market needs, because this vision was described at least 10 years ago and still is not here.

    An important driver/enabler is the health gateway, which sits between sensor devices and remote services. It’s likely to be a smartphone or tablet, with the smartphone offering greater mobility.

  3. Pingback: Cardiac Patients will Benefit from Digital Health Technologies | The Digital Health Corner

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s